September 2008 - Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 30-09-2008 18:00
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Scan complete for testing (i686) at /home/ftp/testing/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup libdvbpsi-0.1.6-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz vlc-0.9.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz The following files are in the repo but not the db They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup libdvbpsi5-0.1.6-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (x86_64) at /home/ftp/testing/os/x86_64/ The following files are in the repo but not the db They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup libdvbpsi5-0.1.6-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 30-09-2008 12:00
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup lighttpd-1.4.19-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (x86_64) at /home/ftp/testing/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup libdvbpsi5-0.1.6-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 30-09-2008 09:00
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup ktorrent-3.1.2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz lighttpd-1.4.19-4-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup ktorrent-3.1.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (i686) at /home/ftp/testing/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup libdvbpsi5-0.1.6-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 29-09-2008 21:00
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup libgphoto2-2.4.2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (i686) at /home/ftp/testing/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup vlc-0.9.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Package Colours - better visual information
by Jud 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

> 2008/9/29 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Giovanni Scafora <linuxmania at > > gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2008/9/28, Jud <jud at judfilm.net>: > >>> I had an idea to improve the information provided to the user and > >>> indicate a clearer picture of the status of a Package via the > >>> website. > >>> > >>> Package Colours - 6 Major states of a Package > >>> ----------------------------------------------- > >>> Black - latest version, all ok > >>> > >>> Blue - latest version, bug report(s) outstanding > >>> > >>> Red - out-of-date > >>> > >>> Yellow - out-of-date, new package in Testing > >>> > >>> Orange - out-of-date, new package in Testing, bug report(s) > >>> outstanding > >>> > >>> Purple/Magenta - out-of-date, bug report(s) outstanding > >> > >> It would be a good idea. > >> +1 > > > > It's a nice idea, but the "outstanding bugs" part would be difficult > > for us, as Flyspray is not integrated into the system... > > I'm sure we could do the "outdated, new package in testing" part > > though. Dusty? Would this be a lot of work? > > Excepting the flyspray integration it shouldn't be too much work to do > it hackishly, but to do it properly would be a bit of a chore. > Currently there isn't much of a connection between packages in core > and packages in testing, since testing is just another repo. My head > keeps bouncing around ideas for redesigning the web package models to > support more of a 'workflow' style that would support this and some of > Jud's other ideas more intuitively, but right now I need to find some > way to get the time for this. > > I'm also getting fired up about creating a new bug tracker that > integrates with the package system that would make some of this other > stuff more trivial. I don't much like flyspray and this would be a > good start for some of my other plans. But again, I need to rearrange > my life so I can take more time for these things first. > > In the meantime, Jud, can you file a bug report for this so I don't > forget it. My memory is getting shorter and shorter these days. > > Dusty This part was cut off all the replies: " I'm not picky about the colours as long as it seems logical. Also, I have filed this as a feature request: FS#11604 - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11604 " @ Dusty - What can "we" do to help you get this organised?

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] dhcpcd 4.0.1-2
by Ronald van Haren 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

please signoff for both architectures. # changes wrt to dhcpcd3 series: August 2008 sees the first release of dhcpcd-4. The new version moves all configuration to /libexec/dhcpcd-run-hooks, apart from interface address and routing. We also use the same variables as dhclient which means existing custom scripts for dhclient can readily work with dhcpcd with minimal tweaking. Also, the dhcpcd internals have been re-worked around a table setup to extract options directly from the DHCP message instead of populating a custom object and dealing with that. Finally, NetworkManager-0.7.0 works with dhcpcd-4 when built with --with-dhcp-client=dhcpcd. NetBSD -current (4.99.72) imports dhcpcd-4.0.0-rc4 into their base system Smiling the hooks file location are changed to /usr/libexec in the package. Ronald

6 8

[arch-dev-public] nano -w (was: Re: [signoff] nano 2.0.8-1)
by Roman Kyrylych 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin(a)gmail.com>: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Eduardo Romero <k3nsai(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 14:57 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> I have disabled all line wrapping to prevent broken config files like >>> this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290 >>> >>> -Please signoff (also ncurses related) >>> >>> -Andy >> Just a thought, and I hope is not too late. Wouldn't it be better to >> make the installer use 'nano -w' instead of just 'nano'? We have just >> removed a functionality from the nano package by disabling line wrapping >> from the package itself. Also, I'm having a hard time getting used to >> not type, 'nano -w' when I want to edit a file, that command just >> doesn't work anymore. > > I apparently had line wrapping turned on in my /etc/nanorc too that > yelled at me. I kinda agree with Eduardo here. Maybe we should > re-enable this. There's a bug about missing -w in installer: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11468 So should we add -w to installer and re-enable word-wrapping in nano, or should I close this bugreport as "Fixed" now? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

4 6

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 29-09-2008 18:00
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup bzr-1.6.1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz lame-3.98-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz sshfs-1.9-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (i686) at /home/ftp/testing/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup freenx-0.7.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (x86_64) at /home/ftp/testing/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup freenx-0.7.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Repository Maintenance 29-09-2008 15:00
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup streamtuner-0.99.99-8-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup streamtuner-0.99.99-8-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (i686) at /home/ftp/testing/os/i686/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup nxclient-3.2.0.13-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Scan complete for testing (x86_64) at /home/ftp/testing/os/x86_64/ The following files are out of date They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup nxclient-3.2.0.13-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Package Colours - better visual information
by Jud 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

I had an idea to improve the information provided to the user and indicate a clearer picture of the status of a Package via the website. Package Colours - 6 Major states of a Package ----------------------------------------------- Black - latest version, all ok Blue - latest version, bug report(s) outstanding Red - out-of-date Yellow - out-of-date, new package in Testing Orange - out-of-date, new package in Testing, bug report(s) outstanding Purple/Magenta - out-of-date, bug report(s) outstanding I'm not picky about the colours as long as it seems logical. Also, I have filed this as a feature request: FS#11604 - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11604

4 3