February 2009 - Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] ndiswrapper / ndiswrapper-utils 1.54-1
by Tobias Powalowski 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Hi please signoff for both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] tzdata 2009b-1
by Andreas Radke 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

next minor upstream update. please signoff. -Andy The files... ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzcode2009b.tar.gz ...and... ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2009b.tar.gz ...are now available; these reflect the changes circulated last week on the time zone mailing list. --ado

3 2

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-pages 3.18-1
by Andreas Radke 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

time for the next man-pages bump. please signoff. -Andy

3 2

[arch-dev-public] Problems to build kde3 packages
by Douglas Soares de Andrade 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

Hi all, Im trying to update tellico and im having a strange problem. When i do this command: [douglas@ingravitto ~]$ /opt/kde/bin/kde-config --prefix /opt/kde It works ok =) But inside the PKGBUILD, Fakeroot - it returns empty. I have been trying a lot of things but none of then worked. Thanks a lot

3 7

[arch-dev-public] Remove "versions" from flyspray
by Aaron Griffin 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

So I just got a bug report with a little comment at the bottom saying "shouldn't you be able to report 2009.02 as the version now?" I want to remove the versions from the ArchLinux project because it's totally irrelevant. Any issue with that? The Release Engineering project has release versions

4 6

[arch-dev-public] state and maintainership of man(-db)/man-pages
by Andreas Radke 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

I'm the current maintainer of man and man-pages packages. But this affects also all other packages that install any kind of man-pages: We have serious issues and some errors reported that are related to the man package. The current man package has problems with character encoding: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7477 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9130 and probably with deeper links: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-February/010257.html http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-January/010056.html Is there anybody who wants to take over the maintainance for all man related stuff? If not I'll do whatever we are going to decide but with relative low priority. For the encoding: Fedora does a recoding in almost every spec file. We could this this similar with a big afford and everybody would have to take care about it or don't care about it at all. man-db as a man replacement promises to solve this. http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-December/009570.html and http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-December/009581.html I'm almost for changing to man-db. We would just have to decide how to update the db. How is this currently done for "man"? In pacman? Could this be easily changed/added for man-db? If not what would be the generic proto hook for a post.install call? Has anybody tried the AUR pkg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9343 ? -Andy

4 5

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] man-pages 3.17-1
by Andreas Radke 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

next minor upstream release. please signoff. -Andy

4 6

[arch-dev-public] Moonlight in ArchLinux?
by Daniel Isenmann 15 Feb '09

15 Feb '09

Hi, there were a discussion on the arch-general list about why not adding moonlight to the repo (http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2009-January/003326.html) Now I want to discuss this topic further from a developer point of view. I want your opinion about that topic, should we add moonlight to the extra repo? And please don't give answers like: "What do we want with this Micr**** shit?". We have closed source software like flashplayer in our repos, so why not add an open source product which do nearly the same (not seen as compatible to flash, instead nearly same technology, etc.). I would maintain it, because it belongs to mono (more or less). Some information about moonlight: --------------------------------- The project page is here: http://mono-project.com/Moonlight The license shouldn't be a problem, it's distributed under open source licenses. More information on the project page or here: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMonoGroup/Moonlight (which are the information of the debian mono group). If you want try moonlight, feel free to build it on your own from my submitted PKGBUILD in the AUR (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23384) If you need some webpages to test moonlight: http://go-mono.com/moonlight/MoonlightStatus.aspx Cheers, Daniel

10 13

[arch-dev-public] termcap-compat dependencies
by Jan de Groot 14 Feb '09

14 Feb '09

Hello devs, Today I was upgrading genius and found out it had dependencies on termcap-compat. Lookin in the configure file, it checks like this: checking for -ltermcap -> yes: link to -ltermcap, no: check for -lncurses I've seen some bugs last week that involved termcap-compat dependencies as a result of building on a system which is not clean (to the devs not doing it yet: build in chroots, not on your working system which is polluted with unneeded packages and AUR stuff). These bugs were fixed by actually adding these dependencies. Please don't add additional dependencies like this old deprecated termcap-compat package just because a bug was reported, but please check out if it's really needed as dependency and leave it out when possible.

3 3

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.5-1
by Tobias Powalowski 14 Feb '09

14 Feb '09

Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - bump to latest version fixed: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13232 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12361 please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

5 5