May 2010 - Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] tzdata 2010j-1
by Andreas Radke 15 May '10

15 May '10

New timezone package. Please signoff, check with "date". -Andy The files... ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzcode2010j.tar.gz ...and... ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2010j.tar.gz ...are now available; these reflect the changes circulated on the time zone mailing list for Bahia de Banderas and for version naming. --ado

2 1

[arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-commits] Commit in dialog/trunk (PKGBUILD)
by Allan McRae 15 May '10

15 May '10

Can I make a request to please file a bug report about these rather than just fixing the md5sums. In this case it looks like that package was recompressed after release without any actual changes (the file creation date is a month after release...), but I have seen stupid upstream people make a quick bugfix and replace the tarball hoping no-one has used the previous tarball. Especially in the later case, it is important the maintainer checks why the checksum differs from what they use to build the package. Allan -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [arch-commits] Commit in dialog/trunk (PKGBUILD) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 19:41:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Eric Bélanger <eric(a)archlinux.org> Reply-To: Arch Linux packaging commits <arch-commits(a)archlinux.org> To: arch-commits(a)archlinux.org Date: Friday, May 14, 2010 @ 19:41:28 Author: eric Revision: 80291 fixed md5sums Modified: dialog/trunk/PKGBUILD ----------+ PKGBUILD | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Modified: PKGBUILD =================================================================== --- PKGBUILD 2010-05-14 23:31:05 UTC (rev 80290) +++ PKGBUILD 2010-05-14 23:41:28 UTC (rev 80291) @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ license=('GPL') depends=('ncurses>=5.6-8') source=(ftp://invisible-island.net/${pkgname}/${pkgname}-$_pkgver.tgz) -md5sums=('ada629276646b462aaab1e734f626eb6') +md5sums=('3d62219658fdddf3c6247fb45831a5d0') +sha1sums=('ebf5fa7419601425a10446215cc477d92c191c5a') build() { cd ${srcdir}/$pkgname-$_pkgver

2 1

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community 14-05-2010
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 14 May '10

14 May '10

================================================== = Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community = ================================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking hierarchy ==> checking for circular dependencies ==> checking for differences between db files and pkgbuilds Duplicate PKGBUILDs --------------------- /srv/abs/rsync/any/core/licenses vs. /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64/core/licenses /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-ca vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-da vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-de vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-el vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-en_gb vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-es vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-et vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-fr vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-gl vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-it vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-ja vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-kk vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-nb vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-nds vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-nl vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-pl vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-pt vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-pt_br vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-sv vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-tr vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-uk vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-zh_tw vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64/extra/vim vs. /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64/extra/gvim Missing Dependencies ---------------------- community/airsnort --> 'wlan-ng26-utils' community/sysprof-module --> 'kernel26<2.6.' Missing Makedepends --------------------- core/dash --> 'klibc>=1.5' extra/v86d --> 'kernel26<2.6.33' Repo Hierarchy for Dependencies --------------------------------- extra/pan depends on community/gmime22 (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends -------------------------------- core/ca-certificates depends on extra/python (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/crda depends on extra/python-m2crypto (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/ghostscript (137 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/netpbm (45 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/psutils (138 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/opensp (30 extra (make)deps to pull) core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/bigloo depends on community/jdk (1 extra (make)deps to pull : jre) extra/dbus-python depends on community/docutils (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/gnome-speech depends on community/espeak (2 extra (make)deps to pull : portaudio docutils) extra/grml-zsh-config depends on community/txt2tags (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/opengtl depends on community/llvm (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/vigra depends on community/python-sphinx (3 extra (make)deps to pull : pygments docutils python-jinja) extra/xqf depends on community/chrpath (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Packages found in db, but not in tree --------------------------------------- community/shotwell extra/koffice-kplato-doc Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 24 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 4 Repo hierarchy problems: 25 Circular dependencies: 0 In db, but not in tree: 2 In tree, but not in db: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 14-05-2010
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 14 May '10

14 May '10

================================================ = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = ================================================ Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking hierarchy ==> checking for circular dependencies ==> checking for differences between db files and pkgbuilds Duplicate PKGBUILDs --------------------- /srv/abs/rsync/any/core/licenses vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/core/licenses /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-ca vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-da vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-de vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-el vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-en_gb vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-es vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-et vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-fr vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-gl vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-it vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-ja vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-kk vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-nb vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-nds vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-nl vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-pl vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-pt vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-pt_br vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-sv vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-tr vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-uk vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n-zh_tw vs. /srv/abs/rsync/any/extra/koffice-l10n /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/vim vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/gvim Missing Dependencies ---------------------- community/airsnort --> 'wlan-ng26-utils' community/sysprof-module --> 'kernel26<2.6.' Missing Makedepends --------------------- core/dash --> 'klibc>=1.5' extra/v86d --> 'kernel26<2.6.33' Repo Hierarchy for Dependencies --------------------------------- extra/pan depends on community/gmime22 (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends -------------------------------- core/ca-certificates depends on extra/python (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/crda depends on extra/python-m2crypto (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/ghostscript (137 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/netpbm (45 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/psutils (138 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/opensp (30 extra (make)deps to pull) core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/bigloo depends on community/jdk (1 extra (make)deps to pull : jre) extra/dbus-python depends on community/docutils (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/gnome-speech depends on community/espeak (2 extra (make)deps to pull : portaudio docutils) extra/grml-zsh-config depends on community/txt2tags (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/opengtl depends on community/llvm (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/vigra depends on community/python-sphinx (3 extra (make)deps to pull : pygments docutils python-jinja) extra/xqf depends on community/chrpath (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Packages found in db, but not in tree --------------------------------------- community/shotwell extra/koffice-kplato-doc Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 24 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 4 Repo hierarchy problems: 25 Circular dependencies: 0 In db, but not in tree: 2 In tree, but not in db: 0

1 0

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gawk-3.1.8-1
by Tobias Powalowski 14 May '10

14 May '10

Hi bump to latest version, Changes from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 --------------------------- 1. The zero flag no longer applies to %c and %s; apparently the standards changed at some point. 2. Updated to latest infrastructure: Autoconf 2.65, Automake 1.11.1, libtool 2.2.6b, Bison 2.4.2. 3. Failure to open a socket is no longer a fatal error. 4. dfa.h and dfa.c are now more-or-less in sync with GNU grep, for the first time in many years. 5. Gawk no longer includes its own copy of libsigsegv but it will use it if installed on the build system. The --disable-libsigsegv configure option is now gone. 6. The ' flag (%'d) is now just ignored on systems that can't support it. 7. Lots of bug fixes, see the ChangeLog. please signoff both arches, thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

3 2

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libgpg-error 1.7-3
by Thomas Bächler 14 May '10

14 May '10

This moves the shared library from /usr/lib to /lib, so that dynamically links cryptsetup works before /usr is mounted.

3 2

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.4-1
by Thomas Bächler 14 May '10

14 May '10

Upstream update, please test carefully and sign off. So far, this build has only been tested in 32 and 64 Bit KVM devices.

5 4

[arch-dev-public] Website updated- package maintainer changes
by Dan McGee 13 May '10

13 May '10

Hey guys, I just pushed a website update today that improves something everyone has been clamoring for- package maintainers. The quick hits: * Package maintainership is now by 'pkgbase'. If you "adopt" one package, you become a maintainer for all packages with that same pkgbase (including across all architectures). This also means when a package is converted from arch-specific to arch-independent, you won't have to re-adopt it. * We will never lose package maintainer info if we lose packages and they come back in a later processing of the DB. Eric will be glad to hear this. * Multiple maintainers are supported. See http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/thunderbird/ for an example. All maintainers will get an email when the package is marked out of date (if they are signed up to do so). With all that said, the concept of package adoption is now not an exclusive affair- multiple people can adopt packages and all be listed as maintainers. Let me (and the list) know if you have any questions. -Dan

7 11

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] popt 1.16-1
by Andrea Scarpino 13 May '10

13 May '10

Upstream release. ChangeLog: - add lv.po, update translations (Translation Project). - include xcode project files in distributed popt tar ball. - make distcheck is now squeaky clean. - permit VPATH builds. - add shallow tests using ISP/RAS api-sanity-autotest.pl. - prefix bit set routines with popt to avoid symbol coolisions w rpm. - add tdict.c to exercise popt bit sets against /usr/dict/words. - add poptBitsArgs() method to generate args bit set. - add methods for bit set union and intersection. - permit comma separated attribute lists, handle negated attributes. - better test for POPT_ARG_BITSET. - add POPT_ARG_BITSET handling. - add POPT_ARG_SHORT handling. - handle all callback traversals within a C switch (for extendability ease). - add popt.pc. - devzero2000: add AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR to configure. Create build-aux - devzero2000: del acinclude.m4 : AC_CHECK_VA_COPY is not used -- Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux

4 9

[arch-dev-public] Add -fstack-protector{-all} to default CFLAGS?
by Allan McRae 12 May '10

12 May '10

Hi, We have a bug report asking to enable stack-smashing protection in our package building. Looking at the overhead estimates by other distros that use it, overall it appears fairly minimal (OpenBSD says 1.3% on average). There used to be some build issues (see bottom of this page for Ubuntu report: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GccSsp) but I am not sure of the current status. Also, it can be disabled with -fno-stack-protector if needed. I am in favour of doing this. I think adding -fstack-protector is enough as that adds protection to only functions "vulnerable" to buffer overflows (as defined by gcc... mainly character arrays) while -fstack-protector-all adds it to all functions. We should maybe also add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. This detects some buffer overflows compile time and others at run time. It was designed to have minimal runtime overhead. Any opinions? Allan

5 10