On Sun, 3 May 2009 10:12:03 +0200 Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST) schrieb Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de>:
http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-set...
I haven't done further investigations but it seems we should take care about keep supporting the FAT file system.
How is the state with NTFS? Is the license situation there more safe?
Opinions?
-Andy
Kernel developers are working on it:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/31491/
We might think to use this option in our next kernel packages.
I think this a step backwards if we do this. We loose functionality in (correct) writing nearly all USB mass storage devices. Why should we do that? I think this is only really important to companies which sell embedded linux, like Jan mentioned it. -1 from my side for doing this. Cheers, Daniel