18 Jan
2008
18 Jan
'08
12:19 a.m.
Dan McGee wrote:
What this does *NOT* mean is that versioned provisions will ever be supported. This is the reason we did not go with the = sign originally- it might lead packagers to believe they were supported. Versioned provisions really don't make sense- if someone can provide a use case, I can probably debunk it.
Just to clarify, what Dan meant here is that the only supported operator is = (no >=, <=, >, <).