4 Oct
2007
4 Oct
'07
4:50 p.m.
Ok, here's where the confusion lies. Let me explain the way I thought we planned on doing this, so we can see where the confusion lies. Release: YYYY.MM Bug fix: Original YYYY.MM plus -NUM New kernel: New YYYY.MM So, if this is a bug fix release for the 2007.09 ISO, I was under the assumption the date would remain 2007.09. I thought we had planned to only change the date when the kernel changes. In which case, the "codename" would change. Here the date has changed. So I am assuming the codename should. Am I the one that is confused or is it the other way around?