On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 10:07, Arch Website Notification <nobody@archlinux.org> wrote:
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 8 fully signed off packages * 36 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) ==
* binutils-2.22-1 (i686) * gcc-4.6.2-2 (i686) * glibc-2.14.1-2 (i686) * linux-api-headers-3.1.4-1 (i686) * binutils-2.22-1 (x86_64) * gcc-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) * glibc-2.14.1-2 (x86_64) * linux-api-headers-3.1.4-1 (x86_64
One of these packages seem to have broken my network. I'll downgrade one-by-one tonight to figure out which one, and create a more sensible bug report.
I'm back home now, and unable to reproduce with my own wireless network. I guess this can be ignored then... -t