On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:54:57 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
Signature files are optional and the previous behaviour is unchanged when signatures files do not exist.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Oudompheng <remy@archlinux.org> --- This patch was already posted with very slight differences on the mailing-list by Allan. It needed several changes to fit the current state of dbscripts. I hope this one will allow to move forward.
Still nothing in the test suite: we would need to run gpg after the extra-*-build invocation and extra checks for the presence/absence of signature files in the repos.
I am a little confused by this patch. If I get the current repo-add code right, gpg signatures will be base64 encoded and added to the db files. So there should be no need to provide .sig files for every single package. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre