10 Feb
2011
10 Feb
'11
10:12 p.m.
On 11/02/11 06:28, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 11 February 2011 00:59, Pierre Schmitz<pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
I wonder the same. I cannot imagine why anybody would want to use vi. Personally I would not mind if nano was the only interactive editor in [core].
I am in full agreement.
My last Arch install was the first and only time I have ever used nano. And that was only because I could not use the piece of crap that is our current vi package (I'm not vim guru but I usually manage in vim just fine). Is the current vi package actually usable for an install by someone more familiar with it? Allan