On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 05:55 +0200, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:07:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 2/6/19 9:08 am, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
1. Simplified repositories Currently we have [core], [extra] and [community]. These threerepositories are there, because they have grown to this structure overtime. At the moment I don't see any real meaning for the split of [core]and [extra]. So one suggestion would be to either: - merge [extra] and [core]
I stopped reading here. If you don't understand the difference between[core] and [extra], you should ask. Particularly before proposing theremoval of [core]. Allan
Hi Allan,I didn't propose the removal of [core], I proposed a discussion aroundthe current repository and organisation structure. Merging [core] and[extra] is just one of many ideas. If you have something to say, pleasedo so and don't keep your secret. I would be glad if you could share it. chris
Hello, [core] packages must land in [testing] and receive signoffs before reaching [core].In other words, packages in [core] must receive positive feedback before a wider diffusion.This introduce a latency to lower the risk of base components breaking. So, before merging [core] and [extra] we should have a way to flag packages which requires signoffs. Secretly, Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer