Dale Blount wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 16:01 -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out, Pierre. I'll have a look at it. The update script needs to be generalized so that changes to 1 can be applied to both easily. I had done the i686 one thinking that whoever had originally implemented community64 would do that one.. but if nobody has done it, I will have a look. Perhaps it might be a good idea to document this. I did not even find the
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2007 15:08:35 schrieb Paul Mattal: scripts on gerolde. So this should be a good start. ;-)
Pierre
-- Any progress on this? It's starting to become a very serious problem. The community64 repo hasn't been updated for over 2 weeks now. All current work (updating/porting) on community64 is stalled and waiting for the fix. Several users are starting to complain with reason.
If time is a problem, can you tell us, Pierre and myself, how to fix it?
I tried, and failed. I can't see any of the changes that Paul speaks of to migrate to Arch64 also. Paul, please enlighten us.
I think this is now fixed; I merged the changes into tupkgupdate64 from tupkgupdate for now, rather than go for the clean solution. This should get things up and running. I also just rebuilt the database so it is current again. Please post again if it does not do the trick. The diffs match, aside from the 64-bit changes, so I'd be surprised if it didn't work. - P