Saturday 03 November 2007, Tobias Powalowski wrote: | Am Samstag, 3. November 2007 schrieb Andreas Radke: | > Do we really need there rules? Can't we let the decision up to | > the maintainer? | > | > If we really need a rule I vote for providing packages pure | > upstream with a post.install message how to get it archiefied. | > Either with cp -f an included archiefied config/splash/theme | > over the default one or to show what additional package will | > provide the related Arch stuff. | > | > Andy | > | > _______________________________________________ | > arch-dev-public mailing list | > arch-dev-public@archlinux.org | > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public | | Im against the non archifying, on screenshots you only see the | distro that runs because of the wallpaper or splash screens | nowhere else. i tend to agree here. leaving everywhere our fingerprints is a good thing. from the pr-psychological reason, i would brand anything that is 1) easy to brand (up to the maintainer of the piece if it is easy enough or not) 2) not forbidden to be branded/changed by upstream rules 3) makes it look decent (starting opengl fireworks with the arch-logo displayed when you launch an kde editor for example is overdoing it) 4) do not associates us with something we are not associated with - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><