On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 30/01/11 07:11, Dan McGee wrote:
Things we don't truly need, AFAIK:
* gerolde: all of /srv/ftp/archive/pkgs * gerolde: /srv/ftp/iso and /srv/ftp/archive/iso
I didn't delete the ISOs yet, but I did zap /srv/ftp/archive/pkgs. I'll wait a few more days to see if anyone has strong opinions.
What is our policy on this stuff? Nostalgic, sure, but usable or necessary? We have all sorts of full and base images, scsi-specific, etc. but outside of keeping arch-0.1 do we really want to appear like we care about previous releases? * gerolde: /srv/cvs This is "gone"; the contents of /srv/cvs is available in /srv/cvs.tar.xz if ever necessary.
* sigurd: Unfortunately not a lot here to kill, and our disk is hovering in that 85% range. * sigurd: /srv/cvs Gone; it was the same as what was on gerolde.
* gerolde /srv/ftp/other: We can remove old source tarballs that are no longer needed from there directories. @Remy: the biggest thing here taking up space is texlive stuff. Can you make it part of your release process to clean this up every once in a while? You don't necessarily need to delete all old versions, but we probably don't need more than 1 or 2 previous ones.
* /var/log : we could configure logrotate to compress the old logs. That'll save some space. It would, but not really space on the right partitions. We already compress HTTP logs on both servers that have them and that is the bulk of the needed space. mail.log is big on gerolde but that partition has
OpenOffice was the other big culprit, I removed a few of those, and also some glibc snapshots from <2010. plenty of room. @Pierre: thanks for adjusting CLEANUP_KEEP. -Dan