6 Feb
2010
6 Feb
'10
10:52 p.m.
Am 06.02.2010 15:14, schrieb Paul Mattal:
All,
There's been some compelling arguments made in the below bug request to switch from syslog-ng to rsyslog:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12314
I'm planning to start the process of migrating to rsyslog in March, if a rough show of hands here confirms it's the right thing to do.
Can people give a quick +1 or -1 to this idea?
- P
+/-0 if we keep maintaining syslog-ng in extra and don't actually "replace" it (as in pacman-replace).