21 Dec
2019
21 Dec
'19
3:58 p.m.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 12:18 PM Allan McRae via arch-dev-public < arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 21/12/19 7:31 pm, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote:
Downstream consumers of libx11 shouldn't have to know and account for libx11's headers/pkg-config files referencing xorgproto. A libx11-devel package would depend on xorgproto. Since there's no separate -devel package, the dependency stays with the regular libx11 package.
This matches my opinion on the matter.
Ditto. (a) and (c) are the technically correct solutions, and I prefer (a). Unless we want to start a distro-wide effort of splitting out -devel packages, that is.