Am 13.01.2010 22:21, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@archlinux.org> wrote:
2010/1/13, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
As a dependency of filesystem? That doesn't make sense at all. Just because we have a file with an optional entry doesn't make it a dependency.
Well, then we can put rfkill to extra, right?
I dunno. I don't fully understand it, to be honest, probably because I don't need it. What I do understand is that rfkill is related to wireless devices and connections. I think we should put it along with the rest of the wireless stuff
If your wireless doesn't work, it might be because it is soft-blocked (that happened to lots of people with 2.6.31). Having it in core will be helpful in such cases. However, I think this has been solved and everything is unblocked these days. rfkill will soon be an optdepend of netcfg, but it can still be in extra. I have no arguments for any side.