Re: [arch-dev-public] Kernel 2.6.29 series moved to testing

Tobias Powalowski schrieb:

added this request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13486

I thought we said that we only add smack if we can compile it =m (which we couldn't).

broken binary modules: - aufs - lirc Please maintainers of those packages fix those.

Are we still adding these weird aufs patches? IMO, the aufs/unionfs situation should be solved more cleanly. They both require us to patch the kernel and both are not too clean. There is an ongoing effort to push aufs2 to mainline, so maybe it is better to use aufs2 instead of aufs?