On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Travis Willard wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:03:52 -0500 (EST) Eric Belanger <belanger@ASTRO.UMontreal.CA> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Andreas Radke wrote:
After Xorg has moved and now we should really remove dead testing packages:
aufs-20071017-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz avahi-0.6.19-1.pkg.tar.gz boost-1.34.0-2.pkg.tar.gz celestia-1.4.1-4.pkg.tar.gz codecs-20071007-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz csup-20060318-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz emacs-22.1-1.pkg.tar.gz ffmpeg-20071009-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz initscripts-2007.11-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz ivtv-utils-1.0.2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz jre-6-3.pkg.tar.gz klibc-1.5-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz klibc-extras-2.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz klibc-module-init-tools-3.2.2-1-i686...> klibc-udev-116-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz km-0.6.1-1.pkg.tar.gz mdadm-2.6.4-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz mkinitcpio-0.5.16-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz mlocate-0.18-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz mplayer-1.0rc2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz netcfg-1.99.32-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz nss-mdns-0.10-1.pkg.tar.gz ntop-3.3-3.1-i686.pkg.tar.gz packages.txt screen-4.0.3-4.pkg.tar.gz testing.db.tar.gz wicd-1.3.1-4-i686.pkg.tar.gz
These packages are only in i686: -aufs -avahi -boost -celestia -csup -emacs -ffmpeg -ivtv-utils -jre -km -mlocate -nss-mdns -ntop -screen
There can all be removed? Please make sure in the future to keep x86_64 and i686 in sync!
Andy
I've removed screen and mlocate as they're already in core.
Several of these packages seemed to have been untagged but not removed from the ftp site. Also, the boost package is older than the one in extra. Is it OK if I remove the ones that fall in this category?
What should we do with the km package? It's kernel modules build for 2.6.20. We should either remove it if it's no longer needed or rebuild it.
Eric
I replied earlier today to this thread, but it seems not to have made it to the list?
In any case, avahi and nss-mdns were my fault, and I removed them a while ago.
-- Travis
I have removed the following packages: aufs, boost, emacs, jre, ntop They were at an older or the same version than the package currently in extra. Except aufs, they were all already untagged from testing. About the rest: celestia: the package in testing is newer than the one in extra but it hasn't been tagged. Therefore, users can't install it. Is it a mistake or is there a reason behind that? ffmpeg and ivtv-utils: I'm currently building them for x86_64 km: Any opinions about it? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.