10 May
2017
10 May
'17
8:04 p.m.
On 05/05/17 at 06:58am, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:29 AM Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public < arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
Problematic with 4.11, license needs to be patched I don't think this is legal. http://rglinuxtech.com/?p=1935
We could patch the kernel to make the needed symbols non-GPL instead. That at least sounds less problematic (IANAL).
There is a patch for 4.12 to undo the change from GregKH. [1] [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d557d1b58b3546bab2c5bc2d624c5709840... -- Jelle van der Waa