Re: [arch-dev-public] Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions

On Feb 10, 2008 3:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:

Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst depends on our packaging scheme?

Basically yes - the way it's set up to do distribution-specific packaging essentially expects you to create 'fglrx' packages. I think we can do without the metapackage again, though.