Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] rfkill 0.3-3 (WAS: Re: [signoff] rfkill 0.3-2 (WAS: Re: [signoff] filesystem 2010.01-1-any && New package to core (or extra if you don't want core): rfkill))

13 Jan 2010

      On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Giovanni Scafora
<giovanni@archlinux.org> wrote:
...
2010/1/13, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>:
...
 Can I please get signoffs on rfkill and filesystem? And opinions about
 core vs. extra for rfkill?
I think that rfkill should go to core repo as dependency of filesystem.
As a dependency of filesystem? That doesn't make sense at all. Just
because we have a file with an optional entry doesn't make it a
dependency.

Currently filesystem has 0 depends. Why does rfkill make more sense
than, say, shadow or pam or bash?

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] rfkill 0.3-3 (WAS: Re: [signoff] rfkill 0.3-2 (WAS: Re: [signoff] filesystem 2010.01-1-any && New package to core (or extra if you don't want core): rfkill))

Aaron Griffin