On Wednesday 15 August 2012 17:56:00 Thomas Bächler wrote:
Another point: Someone on the so-called "official" G+ stated:
"Arch will move to systemd only boot process..."
As Tom stated (and he maintains systemd and initscripts), this is not true. This angers me because
1) Something untrue and/or unprecise is being posted on the "official" G+. 2) There are claims that this G+ is official. Neither our website, nor any place else states that there is an official Arch G+ (or Facebook) page and links to it. This G+ has not been approved by developers to be "official". Yet, someone here claims to be the official G+.
This must stop. If we present ourselves on social media, I want it to be approved on the private mailing list first. And if someone starts that discussion, it will get a big -1 from me.
Well, I created that page on January and since then _we_ (managers' page: me, Ionut, Ray, s, Daniel) never write something which wasn't announced by our website. Until today. I don't know who write that (neither I wanna know), but you pointed out something true, so I already removed the "official" suffix from our page and "fixed" the post about systemd. I hope this is ok now. -- Andrea