On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 09:39 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 8:10 PM, K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 07:11 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 1:34 AM, Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:16:19PM -0500, K. Piche wrote:
I put perl 5.10.0 in testing. It follows the new perl hierarchy, the install file removes the symlink farm that confused everybody and it prints a small blurb about the update.
Please test,
As mentioned by Pierre I ran into the ptar and ptardiff conflicts. I ended up just forcing the upgrade (probably not the best idea in the long run though).
What's the conflicting package? I've never seen a conflict.
perl-archive-tar (required by spamassassin)
I'd venture a guess that it's not needed anymore? Maybe rebuild spamassassin without the dep and/or add a conflicts/provides to the new perl package?
Yep. Archive::Tar is included as a standard module now with 5.10.0. A good number of provides will be added to the next testing perl pkg. -- K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>