19 Mar
2012
19 Mar
'12
8:40 a.m.
On 03/19/2012 07:43 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 19/03/12 14:52, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-03-19 08:20:34 +1000] Allan McRae:
I think thet gnupg1 is more suited to what _ALL_ Arch systems use gpgme for. The simple verification of package signatures.
Well, linux-2.6.27.62 would also be sufficient to run Arch. But we only package modern stable upstream releases, and certain users actually make use of their modern features.
As I pointed out before, whether gnupg2 is a stable version or an "unstable development version" (http://www.gnupg.org/download/release_notes.en.html) is up for debate. If that gets changed by upstream, then I will have no objection to dropping gnupg1.
Allan
did any of you actually asked upstream about this? :D -- Ionuț