On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <b@bpiotrowski.pl> wrote:
On 2013-05-14 22:37, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <bpiotrowski@nymeria.archlinux.org> wrote:
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 @ 22:22:08 Author: bpiotrowski Revision: 90846
SMTP forwarders aren't as crucial as bash is Without judging what you say, It's not a reason to break them!
I don't see any reason to revert changes or delay moving binaries to /usr/bin. Just message maintainer that his package is broken due to recent changes.
You're not alone to provide a smtp forwarder "virtual" package and the path provided by all must be the same. We cannot ask to users and others packagers to update their path if it is not the same accross smtp forwarders. Some packages will works with exim and others will not works with postfix, openstmpd, ssmtp, etc. The fail2ban package is a good example. This let no time to others to rebuild against the new path without breaking things and make us rush because you decide. This is *strong* reasons to revert your change. My suggestion is to wait Allan runs the final /usr move, because fixing the path in all _not_ packaged scripts or webapps is boring and not necessary. And we will need to be synchronized for the final step, so it will be easy to fixed package at this moment. Let's be pragmatic. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A