3 Aug
2009
3 Aug
'09
12:47 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 14:13, Daenyth Blank<daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 04:39, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't really understand why minimal .25 kernel is a problem? Aren't we the bleeding edge distro?
For some virtualized providers (slicehost off the top of my head), they use their own kernel that isn't as up to date. This update would break all such hosted Arch servers.
IgnorePkg? And how often are such hosted Arch servers updated anyway? And we do not support custom kernels officially anyway. What I'm trying to say is that holding updates because of this is not acceptable IMO. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)