Re: [arch-dev-public] discussions to death, rules - no innovations?

On 10/23/07, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa@solnet.ch> wrote:

however, it lacks things, that i usually specify in my SRs: deadlines on when something will be decided.

I was on the fence about this. The reason is that I/we already have so many normal deadlines doing other things, one or two more might be "too much", The intent, of the "short term" tasks, was to address them as soon as possible, and the long term ones would be more lax. In a way, the intent was to provide an unofficial and nebulous set of deadlines. The problem is, most of us are not action oriented. And this is a big problem.