Although I don't exactly know what's the "original purpose" I'll try to make sure no big radical changes are made without consensus from the community :)
Thanks both of you! -Santiago.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:41:56PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Yeah, that was the "and please don't get it the wrong way" part which obviously did not work. I thought I just put this out there as I already got PRs and mails from different people who wanted to make the image more minimal by removing files from packages or provide different images for all kind of uses cases.
I just wanted to avoid frustration beforehand but not discourage your work. I probably failed on this one :-)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 2018-03-12 05:33, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Thanks for digging this up again. You may use the github issue or project system to plan the different steps. Also (and please don't get it the wrong way) let's keep the purpose I intended for our Docker image intact.
No one has suggested changing "the purpose". I'm not sure what is unclear in Santiago's mail.