On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
telnet on i686 was fail for me. The escape sequence didn't seem to work at all. Sorry, I actually meant x86_64 here. This was the scene on i686:
I checked it and it's a regression from 1.5. I've notified the upstream devs. I'll try to make a patch. I have no idea about the symlinks.
:: Retrieving packages from testing... inetutils-1.6-1-i686 321.9K 212.4K/s 00:00:02 [---------------------] 100% checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [---------------------] 100% error: could not prepare transaction error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) inetutils: /usr/bin/ftp exists in filesystem inetutils: /usr/bin/rcp exists in filesystem inetutils: /usr/bin/rsh exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
dmcgee@dublin ~ $ pacman -Qo /usr/bin/ftp /usr/bin/rcp /usr/bin/rsh error: No package owns /usr/bin/ftp error: No package owns /usr/bin/rcp error: No package owns /usr/bin/rsh
dmcgee@dublin ~ $ ll /usr/bin/ftp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-08-04 19:19 /usr/bin/ftp -> sftp
dmcgee@dublin ~ $ ll /usr/bin/rcp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:22 /usr/bin/rcp -> scp
dmcgee@dublin ~ $ ll /usr/bin/rsh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:23 /usr/bin/rsh -> ssh
Anyone know where these symlinks came from? No package owns them, and they've obviously been around a while. They didn't exist on my newer x86_64 system.