21 Jan
2009
21 Jan
'09
7:02 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch 21 Januar 2009 19:19:37 schrieb Hugo Doria:
There is a problem with that? Should i change the name of the package for mplayer-svn or can I keep "mplayer"?
Nice to hear that; I hope this will eleminate all problems with smplayer ;-)
Just keep it as mplayer. Good practice is to use svn export, generate a tar ball of the source and upload it into ftp/other/mplayer.
Agreed. Keep it at "mplayer". Please make sure to put the tarballs in ftp/other, as this covers us in terms of GPL compliance and makes it easier for users to rebuild the same package via abs.