Re: [arch-dev-public] GPL2 -> GPL3 license changes in packages

8 Nov 2007


      Thursday 08 November 2007, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
 | Hm, valid point, so you propose to have GPL for GPL2+ (most
 | software) and GPL2 for GPL2-only (e.g. Linux kernel)?
 | Then I guess most PKGBUILDs that changed GPL to GPL2 should be
 | fixed.

to be more consistent, i would say:

GPL1 -> GPL1
GPL2 -> GPL2
GPL3 -> GPL3

GPL -> all GPLs valid (synonyme for 'GPL1' 'GPL2' 'GPL3')

at least i am tagging my pkgs like this

- D

-- 
.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´
            °        °           °
             °      °            °
     ><((((º>      °              °
                    °            °
                   °            <º)))><
                  <º)))><

Re: [arch-dev-public] GPL2 -> GPL3 license changes in packages

Damir Perisa