On Nov 29, 2007 3:51 PM, Dan McGee &lt;<a href="mailto:dpmcgee@gmail.com">dpmcgee@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
My tongue-in-cheek response was a bit too cryptic. I meant to stress<br>the &quot;standard text&quot; part which is non-existent. I know that we cannot<br>and will not include a &quot;license&quot; for something like this, because
<br>public domain is not a license at all. Thus I figured my suggestion<br>for the &#39;none&#39; license was acceptable, but that got shot down<br>quickly...<br></blockquote></div><br>It wasn&#39;t shot down - I said that it&#39;s &quot;assuming sqlite is released with no license whatsoever&quot;.&nbsp; I don&#39;t understand this public domain stuff, so when I looked on their website, I saw something that seemed to be license-ish in nature, and so I also added &quot;I don&#39;t think this is the case&quot;
<br><br>If public-domain == no license whatsoever, then license=(&#39;none&#39;) is probably the way to go, and the &quot;none&quot; license should be recognized as syntactically correct.<br>