Re: [arch-dev-public] On pushing a standalone opencv 3.x

Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:

If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and push 3.x, which should co-exist fine with 2.x. I suppose it's OK to break our naming convention in cases like these.

Have you checked if this is actually still needed? At least KDE packages (digikam, kipi-plugins, libkface) support opencv3 already.