8 Mar
2011
8 Mar
'11
7:46 a.m.
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 15:17 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 08/03/11 03:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
Any objections to add "replaces=('openoffice-base') " to the next LibO pkg?
I'm all for dropping this but is the replaces really needed? That basically rules out anyone supporting it in the AUR (which I know is unlikely...)
If anyone wants to maintain it in AUR, they can change the name. Openoffice-base wasn't such a good name anyways. There's not much "base" in that package.