18 Sep
2007
18 Sep
'07
5:17 p.m.
Tom K wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Andrew Fyfe schrieb:
I will also move the new util-linux (which is actually util-linux-ng) and nfs-utils from testing to core later, unless there are objections. Can this be renamed to util-linux-ng as that's it's official name. It's easier to not change the name for now. If util-linux ever releases a new version, we can rename the package to avoid confusion, but currently it looks like this is not happening.
+1 for using the official name, as that's what we do in Arch, and that's also what we tell users to do when creating packages.
I'd prefer the right way to the easy way.
I agree. However, I ultimately defer to whoever has the time to do this! - P