13 Jul
2007
13 Jul
'07
12:13 p.m.
James Rayner wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:45:31AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
With 2.6.22, we have had numerous reports that kvm locks up or doesn't load. On the other hand, according to Attila (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7598) we can use the kvm version shipped with 2.6.22. This would be easier and it is better tested than the one we build externally.
Are there any reasons for keeping kvm-modules separately?
I think last time it was the internal ones that were broken/out-dated...
That's my memory, too, though more the latter than the former. I know I was using the ones in the kernel until we took them out, and they worked great for me. - P