Monday 14 January 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: | > I brought it up again since we've got the new logo on the site | > now, and people are making noise on the forums to get the kernel | > logo updated. People are just hard to please, heh. :P | > | > Anyway, a decision should be made - either take 'em out, or | > update 'em. | | Well, Thayer has recommended we remove it because the logo loses | most of the effect in the craptacular colors provided by the | initial VGA framebuffer.... me, I'm neutral. I don't reboot enough | for that image to be relevant. send me the SVG of the logo and i'll try to make a kernel logo that tries to resemble the 24bit one. i did so for the last. the VGA framebuffer has a limited ammoutn of colours, you have to dither them to make them look nice. arend we having also a black/white version that looks fine? and also a grey version? - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><