4 Oct
2009
4 Oct
'09
11:09 p.m.
Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2009/10/4, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de>:
what about http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15311 ?
I only rebuilt it for i686. The previous signoff was for x86_64 only.
This was actually my fault. I modified the x86_64 package to fix the no-pdf-documentation bug, and forgot to make it a 2.1 instead of a 3 pkgrel. The theory is that there should be no difference between the i686 and x86_64 version. I signoff i686. - P