On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:33:28 -0400 Eduardo Romero <k3nsai@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
The first time I inform here that the Arch Linux newsletter is out, the June edition is a special one, it contains the article, about the stolen logo. So please, guys, go ahead and digg that article, so we get more coverage, I added the digg button cause I thought that would be the best way to get more media coverage for this issue. So I ask everyone to link to this newsletter on your respective blogs, not the newsletter as a whole, but the stolen logo article most importantly.
http://www.archlinux.org/static/newsletters/newsletter-2009-june.html#stolen...
Also submit to other news sites. Thanks.
TU corner: "even has informed us ...." <--who? "The one downside to pacman is the lack of a rollback feature so you might just have to start from scratch!" <--imho this is an exaggeration or at least an unclarity for what "starting from scratch" means. Worst case you have to boot in single user mode or even boot a liveCD if you screwed up badly. I would make it more clear to avoid confusion. Organize your tasks - Calcurse <-- link incorrect Something that I notice in many newsletters are phrases like "another great Arch Linux newsletter!". I guess different people will intepret it differently but to me it gives the impression the people behind the newsletter (outsiders could extrapolate this to the Arch community as a whole) are a bit arrogant/full of themselves. I'm sure it's not meant like that, I'm just saying that's how I interpret it. When reading homepages/newsletters/announcements/... of various projects/parties I don't like them describing themselves with positive adverbs. I think people/projects should "come out" neutrally and let others judge their qualities. If I'm the only one who thinks this, you can ignore me :P Dieter