8 Jan
2012
8 Jan
'12
9:34 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
One issue is package naming: We could stick with the usual "source tarball == package name" paradigm, but that means that the Intel package is named 'microcode', while the AMD package is named 'amd-ucode' (like it is commited to SVN now). I would prefer calling the Intel package 'intel-ucode', which would be consistent with the AMD version and also match the name of the /lib/firmware/ subdirectory.
I agree with using intel-ucode, having them named differently would be confusing. -t