Hi, I saw your post; I just did not want to go off-topic right away. :-) At least as long as I am the only contributor I hesitate to give up on how the infrastructure is set up. It seems to be much more complex to do this on "official" servers. I like being able to switch things around outside of just deploying some scripts. E.g. I do automatic deployments, updates, change Web server or database configurations etc.. Greetings, Pierre On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:42 PM Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 15:17, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
On 3/14/21 3:07 PM, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public wrote:
I just updated the server to also accept x86_64 feature levels, ARM and even i686. There is a new version of pkgstats (>= 3.1.0; currently in [testing]) which is able to detect feature levels. ARM support is pretty early, but x86_64 should be fine (using Intel's cpuid library).
If you like to check what gets detected on your system run: $ pkgstats submit --dump-json | head system.architecture is your CPU and os.architecture should be the same as "uname -m"
Let me know if this does work for you and especially if it does not. Using Qemu for testing is quite limited and I lack old, new and AMD CPUs.
An API and UI to analyze these data will follow in the future. (I guess we need to wait a few weeks to see some valid results)
Hi Pierre,
that sounds wonderful, thanks for the work, this will be nice data points :)
Did you see my previous mail? It would be amazing if you can consider growing this side-project into something official in terms of being available on http://pkgstats.archlinux.org/
I think this is really a great idea and project that we should advocate in the official hosting namespace :)
cheers and thanks, Levente
I second this and we've tried to touch on this in the past. I think "officializing" pkgstats would be neat.
Cheers, Sven