23 May
2017
23 May
'17
11:35 p.m.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini <grazzolini@archlinux.org> wrote:
What I would be inclined to accept would be that packages are, at least at first, always co-maintained by sponsor and sponsored TU. This way we can assure that new TU's can handle ll the tasks related to maintaining a package. Call it a probation period.
That sounds like it would decrease the amount of sponsoring, rather than increase the amount of applicants. J. Leclanche