On 11/3/07, Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
James Rayner schrieb:
mlocate has replaced slocate as the default locate implementation, this is currently in [testing]. This was requested on the bug tracker a while back[1].
mlocate is used by Fedora at least and unlike slocate, no longer has the well known midnight updatedb crawl. In all other aspects it's compatible with and identical to slocate.
James
[1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4490
As described by the README: mlocate is a locate/updatedb implementation. The 'm' stands for "merging": updatedb reuses the existing database to avoid rereading most of the file system, which makes updatedb faster and does not trash the system caches as much. The locate(1) utility is intended to be completely compatible to slocate. It also attempts to be compatible to GNU locate, when it does not conflict with slocate compatibility.
While I think this is a good thing, this list should be informed _before_ such a change is made and before the [arch] list is informed, and you should wait at least a day for any objections (don't wait for confirmation though, because then nothing will happen). Aaron was always pushing for more communication, so let's practice it.
Despite of all that, I like your initiative.
This was mentioned back on October 9th...
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-October/002119.html
This is just James acting on the already existing confirmation.
Agreed. I poked the list a while back.