On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
We should try to clean up testing faster. I want to start the next big rebuild session for "db". Before that we should sort out what packages can be moved or deleted completely or what holds it back.
I asked dolby to make up lists for a testing repo cleanup that I wanted to do. I haven't heard from him yet. I guess he was just busy with the bugtracker. I was very busy as well. I posted a few comments below.
Here's the current ftp list for i686-testing:
1.7M Apr 4 23:00 exiv2-0.16-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
That exiv2 has a soname bump. All packages that needed a rebuilt (haven't check the bug tracker) are in testing as well. They've been there for a couple of months. Neri: Can they be moved to extra?
742K Apr 8 02:35 openssh-5.0p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
openssh-5.0p1-1 is already in core. this can be removed from testing.
118K May 4 18:31 sudo-1.6.9p15-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Paul and I forgot to start the signoff thread for it. It's now out-of-date.
52K May 23 20:37 mlocate-0.20-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
has been signoffed. I asked for status in its signoff thread today.
mplayer-svn-25449-1
Tom: are you still maintaining it? This is a couple of month old. The current package in unstable is even older. IMO, it should be removed if it's not actively maintained anymore. A couple months old svn package is pointless.
BTW, I was working on a gpm soname bump. The x86_64 packages are ready and I was planning to move them in testing tonight with the i686 ones to follow later tonight or tomorrow. At least one of the rebuilt package for gpm also depends on db. We might not want to mix the 2 soname bump and do the db rebuild when the gpm one will be removed from testing. I was planning to keep the gpm in testing for a week or two to make sure I didn't miss any packages that needed to be rebuilt and because the rebuilt mc package will also have major changes/bug fixes.
Is there something where I can help out?
-Andy
Greg sent me his list. I cleanup some packages which were in both core and testing with the same version. I also moved dssi (it was part of the qt4 update) and k3b (old bugfix FS#9051) to extra. ##x86_64 #core packages man-pages 3.00-1 andyrtr sudo 1.6.9p15-1 already out of date #gpm rebuild aalib 1.4rc5-5 brltty 3.7.2-2 elinks 0.11.4rc1-3 fte 20051115-3 gstreamer0.10-good-plugins 0.10.8-3 gvim 7.1.315-1 jed 0.99.18-4 lde 2.6.1-3 links 2.1pre36-2 mc 4.6.1-5 vi 7.1.315-1 vim 7.1.315-1 xaos 3.3-2 xemacs 21.5.28-4 #exiv2 rebuild digikam 0.9.3-2 exiv2 0.16-2 gimp-ufraw 0.13-2 gwenview 1.4.2-2 kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3 libkexiv2 0.1.6-3 #qt lyx 1.5.5-1 liborigin 20070926-1 already out of date libassuan 1.0.4-2 psi 0.12.svn1160-1 psi-i18n 0.12-1 qca 2.0.0.svn817733-1 qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 qt 4.4.0-4 soprano 2.0.98-1 strigi 0.5.10-1 # archboot 2008.03-2 tpowa mkbootcd 2008.03-1 mkpxelinux 2008.03-1 tpowa mksyslinux 2008.03-1 cpufreqd 2.2.1-2 only in x86_64 testing motion 3.2.9-1 moving it to extra would fix FS#10652 #old packages eigen 1.0.5.svn744389-1 tpowa exim 4.68-4 already out of date hpoj 0.91-12 tpowa kismet 2007_10_R1-1 j.chu nasm 2.01-1 pkrakture pinentry 0.7.3-2 tpowa already out of date redland 1.0.7-1 tpowa #other dnsmasq 2.41-2 already out of date kdelibs 3.5.9-4 pierre ##i686 diff #old pkgs ivtv-utils 1.0.2-1 paul already out of date mplayer-svn 25449-1 #xorg xf86-video-apm-1.2.0-1 xf86-video-ark-0.7.0-1 xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-3 xf86-video-chips-1.2.0-1 xf86-video-savage-2.2.0-1 xf86-video-tdfx-1.4.0-1 xf86-video-trident-1.3.0-1 xf86-video-unichrome-0.2.6-7 xf86-video-via-0.2.2-4 qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 !not in i686 only x86_64 ================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.