7 Jul
2009
7 Jul
'09
5:20 a.m.
On Monday 06 July 2009 23:07:16 Aaron Griffin wrote:
Unless it's an issue, not building, or otherwise broken (ie a technical reason), I'd say leave it in. We've got easy_install for python, cpan for perl, etc.
It's up to the users to decide whether to use pacman or otherwise - not our responsiblility.
I think I agree with James here. What about the people who WANT to use PEAR? I know there are some people who prefer easy_install for python.
What if it would be as easy as pacman -S php-pear to get it? -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre