On 7/31/07, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
2) build kernel modules for custom kernels - why should we support that in core? dkms would be just another possible broken pkg.
I've seen a lot of this attitude recently, and I really want to say that I find it decidedly un-Arch-like. "Why support the users when we can just do it our way?" I've always been a fan of arch because it becomes what _I_ want, not what some packager decided I wanted. I'm pretty sure this is true of a lot of people.
but first of all we should make important decisions: will we keep the repos or do we want to switch to core + something else? any discussion about the content of our still not defined repos won't make much sense for me now.
Hrm, I'd recommend making a new thread for this topic here. Let's not hijack James' topic.