On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:24:01 -0400 schrieb Dale Blount <dale@archlinux.org>:
Why even package 2.6.25.11 for i686 if it's the same as 2.6.25.10? Seems like a waste of time/bandwidth.
Dale
Maybe you are right. But I'm only helping out here on kernel stuff and I'm not sure if this change doesn't touch i686 architecture at all:
Makefile | 2 +- include/asm-x86/desc.h | 4 ++--
And we always want to satisfy our users with all the latest release even if they won't get any gain ;)
2.6.26 is out anyway though, so why bother?
-Dan
FWIIW, signoff i686 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.