Quoting Jelle van der Waa (2017-11-14 20:30:21)
There are several options for migrating the bug history to Bugzilla and a few options are under debate. (input welcome)
* No migration at all * Migrate open bugs * Migrate open bugs and auto-closing them * Migrate all bugs * Migrate all bugs and auto-closing them
In either case, I believe it would be nice to "archive" the current bugtracker and make it read only.
My first reaction is that it'd be nice to not have a bunch of old cruft around, but if we autoclose them and we could get the migrated bugs to have the same ID it would simplify having the old links still work with just a simple redirect to the new URL with the same ID, and it would mean that we wouldn't need to keep the current bugtracker around for the indefinite future.
# Products
* Arch packages (core/extra or split this up) * Community packages (community) * Pacman * AURWeb * Keyring * Archweb (new) * Arch VM / Docker images (new) * Release engineering
I feel like having core and extra as separate products would make searching and filling in the component field a *lot* easier, because that's pretty much my biggest annoyance with e.g. the GNOME bugzilla, their component lists are huge and it's really hard to browse through them. -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 PGP Key FP: 5134 EF9E AF65 F95B 6BB1 608E 50FB 9B27 3A9D 0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/