Tuesday 25 September 2007, Jürgen Hötzel wrote: | core-noarch | core-i686 | core-x86_64 does this mean, we need to rename the repos to include the ARCH in the name? probably no... but the noarch repo would be only one repo, right? probably with its own categories (fonts, i18n, docs, ...). a x86_64 archlinux would have then the following repos: [core] - /core/os/x86_64 [extra] - /extra/os/x86_64 [unstable] - /unstable/os/x86_64 [community] - /community/os/x86_64 [testing] - /testing/os/x86_64 [armarium] - /armarium/os/noarch armarium would be the new repo, that is arch independend. i took the word from latin for bookcase, since it holds things in it to be read, used but are independend of the reader/user. little bit philosophy... only a suggestion on the name... feel free to take something else if you dislike it. in such a setup, who would have write access to it? it would be a repo for devs or also TU's? since community is arch dependend! thinking through the idea, i cannot think of something else more elegant. therefore +1 ... under the condition that we have probably to settle some details on the way of implementing it. - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><