On Dec 2, 2007 2:56 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 8:46 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> > Looking for a signoff for i686 for the following packages in testing:
> >
> > bash
> > dash (new)
> > hwdetect
> > shadow
> > filesystem
> >
> > Most of the updates deal with adding a new shell and a new provide
> > (sh), and the update to shadow is to remove its dependency on
> > coreutils which was one of our remaining circular dependencies.
> >
> > I'd appreciate it if someone wanted to rebuild these for x86_64- I
> > wouldn't feel comfortable building a core package outside a chroot,
> > which I currently do not have access to.
>
> I'll build the x86_64 pkg.

Um...anyone? Otherwise I'm just going to assume they are fine by the
end of today.h

That's not the way signoffs work.  You CAN'T just 'assume' they are fine.  You have to wait.  Sorry, but it breaks the whole system otherwise.

Signed off for i686 (bash, dash, shadow, hwdetect)

However, question about filesystem:
 $ pacman -Ql filesystem
filesystem /etc/arch-release
filesystem /etc/crypttab
filesystem /etc/fstab
filesystem /etc/group
filesystem /etc/gshadow
filesystem /etc/host.conf
filesystem /etc/hosts
filesystem /etc/issue
filesystem /etc/ld.so.conf
filesystem /etc/motd
filesystem /etc/nsswitch.conf
filesystem /etc/passwd
filesystem /etc/protocols
filesystem /etc/resolv.conf
filesystem /etc/securetty
filesystem /etc/services
filesystem /etc/shadow
filesystem /etc/shells

Isn't it supposed to have a bunch of empty directories in it too (for FHS compliance and such)?  Otherwise, signed off.